SeaweedFSvsSyncWatch同步观影
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SeaweedFS | SyncWatch同步观影 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 35 794 | 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +833 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 28 | 10 |
| Latest release | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 46/100 for SyncWatch同步观影, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for SyncWatch同步观影.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+833 stars in 30 days).
SeaweedFS details →SyncWatch同步观影 details →