seatsurfingvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| seatsurfing | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 315 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.138.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.18.31 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
WBO scores 61/100 against 53/100 for seatsurfing, so it is the safer default.
seatsurfing ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for WBO.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; seatsurfing needs more configuration.
WBO is growing faster right now (+18 stars in 30 days).
seatsurfing details →WBO details →