QloAppsvsWBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QloApps | WBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 14 452 | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.30 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | OSL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
QloApps scores 68/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.
WBO ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.
If you want the quickest setup, WBO is easier to run; QloApps needs more configuration.
QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
QloApps details →WBO details →
Swap a project
Keep QloApps, compare it with
Keep WBO, compare it with