seatsurfingvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| seatsurfing | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 315 | 17 187 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.138.2 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 53/100 for seatsurfing, so it is the safer default.
seatsurfing ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; seatsurfing needs more configuration.
Upptime is growing faster right now (+3 stars in 30 days).
seatsurfing details →Upptime details →