QloAppsvsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| QloApps | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 452 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +66 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | OSL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; QloApps needs more configuration.
QloApps is growing faster right now (+66 stars in 30 days).
QloApps details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep QloApps, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with