SearXNGvsZed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SearXNG | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 38 953 | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 387 | +244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 31 |
| Latest release | — | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.
Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for SearXNG.
If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 387 stars in 30 days).
SearXNG details →Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) details →
Swap a project
Keep SearXNG, compare it with
Keep Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), compare it with