SearXNGvsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SearXNG | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 41 in Search Engines | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 38 962 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 396 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
SearXNG scores 86/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; SearXNG needs more configuration.
SearXNG is growing faster right now (+1 396 stars in 30 days).
SearXNG details →static_status details →
Swap a project
Keep SearXNG, compare it with
Keep static_status, compare it with