sdnextvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Trinity ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with