Text Generation WebUIvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Text Generation WebUI | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 69 in AI Chat | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 47 724 | 711 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +24 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 4 |
| Latest release | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
Text Generation WebUI is growing faster right now (+24 stars in 30 days).
Text Generation WebUI details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with