sdnextvsTraceRoot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | TraceRoot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 1 124 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.
TraceRoot ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, sdnext is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.
sdnext details →TraceRoot details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep TraceRoot, compare it with