sdnextvsSunshine
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sdnext | Sunshine | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Image Generation | #2 of 22 in Remote Desktop |
| GitHub stars | 7 362 | 42 739 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +16 | +1 263 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 86 |
| Latest release | — | v2026.1028.122642 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sunshine scores 84/100 against 71/100 for sdnext, so it is the safer default.
Sunshine ships more often: 86 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, Sunshine is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
Sunshine is growing faster right now (+1 263 stars in 30 days).
sdnext details →Sunshine details →
Swap a project
Keep sdnext, compare it with
Keep Sunshine, compare it with