scm-managervsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| scm-manager | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 14 in Code Hosting | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 56 874 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +145 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 5 |
| Latest release | 3.11.4 · 11 Feb 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 53/100 for scm-manager, so it is the safer default.
Typst ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for scm-manager.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; scm-manager needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+145 stars in 30 days).
scm-manager details →Typst details →