scalarvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| scalar | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 13 in API | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 16 337 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 46 | 6 |
| Latest release | release-2026-10-28-0d01943 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
scalar scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
scalar ships more often: 46 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, scalar is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
scalar details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep scalar, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with