OpenBBvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OpenBB | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Data Management | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 74 846 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +362 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 6 |
| Latest release | openbb-v5.0.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OpenBB scores 87/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for OpenBB.
If you want the quickest setup, OpenBB is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
OpenBB is growing faster right now (+362 stars in 30 days).
OpenBB details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep OpenBB, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with