Scada-LTSvsUnison
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | Unison | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #2 of 15 in File Sync |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 5 559 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | v2.54.0 · 1 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
Unison scores 65/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Unison ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
Unison is growing faster right now (+65 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →Unison details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep Unison, compare it with