Scada-LTSvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 39 757 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +761 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+761 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with