Scada-LTSvsTypesense
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | Typesense | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #6 of 41 in Search Engines |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 27 063 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +477 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 |
| Latest release | — | v30.2 · 19 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
Typesense scores 79/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Typesense ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Typesense is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Typesense is growing faster right now (+477 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →Typesense details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep Typesense, compare it with