Scada-LTSvsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 21 041 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +105 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Teleport scores 76/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Teleport ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
Teleport is growing faster right now (+105 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →Teleport details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep Teleport, compare it with