Scada-LTSvsTelegraf
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | Telegraf | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #9 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 17 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +55 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v1.40.2 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Telegraf scores 78/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Telegraf ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Telegraf is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Telegraf is growing faster right now (+55 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →Telegraf details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep Telegraf, compare it with