Scada-LTSvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 13 |
| Latest release | — | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
SRS is growing faster right now (+111 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →SRS details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with