Scada-LTSvsSpoolman
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | Spoolman | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #3 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 2 953 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +109 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 7 |
| Latest release | — | v0.27.0 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Spoolman scores 65/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Spoolman ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Spoolman is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Spoolman is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →Spoolman details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep Spoolman, compare it with