Scada-LTSvsSketchForge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | SketchForge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #9 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 1 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.3 · 17 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Scada-LTS and SketchForge score the same (55/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
SketchForge ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, SketchForge is easier to run; Scada-LTS needs more configuration.
Scada-LTS details →SketchForge details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep SketchForge, compare it with