Scada-LTSvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 38 320 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +1 938 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 17 |
| Latest release | — | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 938 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →sglang details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep sglang, compare it with