Scada-LTSvssentry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | sentry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 9 in Application Performance Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 45 672 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +840 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 22 |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Java | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sentry scores 80/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
sentry ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
If you want the quickest setup, Scada-LTS is easier to run; sentry needs more configuration.
sentry is growing faster right now (+840 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →sentry details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep sentry, compare it with