Scada-LTSvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Scada-LTS | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 55/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 019 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 28 |
| Latest release | — | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
Scada-LTS details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with