sandboxed.shvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sandboxed.sh | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 678 | 13 311 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).
sandboxed.sh details →Stash details →