sandboxed.shvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| sandboxed.sh | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #97 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 679 | 29 391 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +7 | +112 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 13 |
| Latest release | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | — | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for sandboxed.sh.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
SRS is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
sandboxed.sh details →SRS details →