SandBase HarnessvsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| SandBase Harness | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #169 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 637 | 13 315 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +305 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.3.8 · 30 Aug 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 39/100 for SandBase Harness, so it is the safer default.
SandBase Harness ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; SandBase Harness needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+305 stars in 30 days).
SandBase Harness details →Stash details →