SaltcornvsStoreDown
Two self-hosted Microsoft Access alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Saltcorn | StoreDown | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #8 of 11 in Inventory Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 087 | 423 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +14 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Saltcorn scores 60/100 against 45/100 for StoreDown, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Saltcorn is easier to run; StoreDown needs more configuration.
Saltcorn is growing faster right now (+14 stars in 30 days).
Saltcorn details →StoreDown details → All Microsoft Access alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep Saltcorn, compare it with
Keep StoreDown, compare it with