SaleorvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Saleor | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 27 in E-commerce | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 23 487 | 95 273 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +2 311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 80 | 25 |
| Latest release | 3.23.45 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Saleor, so it is the safer default.
Saleor ships more often: 80 stable releases in the past year, against 25 for Stirling-PDF.
If you want the quickest setup, Stirling-PDF is easier to run; Saleor needs more configuration.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 311 stars in 30 days).
Saleor details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Saleor, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with