Saki Panelvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Saki Panel | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #21 of 27 in Server Management | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 184 | 114 268 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 559 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v5.1 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 44/100 for Saki Panel, so it is the safer default.
Saki Panel ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Saki Panel is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 559 stars in 30 days).
Saki Panel details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Saki Panel, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with