ryotvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 63/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
ryot details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with