ryotvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 3 650 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +44 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 10 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 64/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+44 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with