ryotvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ryot and WhisperLive---CPU score the same (64/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
ryot details →WhisperLive---CPU details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with