ryotvsweb-check
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | web-check | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 35 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +374 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
web-check ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
web-check is growing faster right now (+374 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →web-check details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep web-check, compare it with