ryotvsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 29 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; ryot needs more configuration.
ryot details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with