ryotvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 4 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 63/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Trinity ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with