ruTorrentvsVert
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ruTorrent | Vert | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent | #2 of 10 in File Conversion |
| GitHub stars | 2 188 | 16 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 | +543 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Vert scores 71/100 against 62/100 for ruTorrent, so it is the safer default.
ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Vert.
If you want the quickest setup, Vert is easier to run; ruTorrent needs more configuration.
Vert is growing faster right now (+543 stars in 30 days).
ruTorrent details →Vert details →
Swap a project
Keep ruTorrent, compare it with
Keep Vert, compare it with