RustFSvswger
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | wger | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #1 of 31 in Health & Fitness |
| GitHub stars | 35 519 | 7 203 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 687 | +240 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 4 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | 2.7 · 3 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 73/100 for wger, so it is the safer default.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for wger.
If you want the quickest setup, wger is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 687 stars in 30 days).
RustFS details →wger details →
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep wger, compare it with