RustFSvsSRS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| RustFS | SRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Storage | #4 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 35 514 | 29 390 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 682 | +111 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 13 |
| Latest release | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 | v7.0-a3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
SRS scores 78/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
SRS ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, SRS is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 682 stars in 30 days).
Swap a project
Keep RustFS, compare it with
Keep SRS, compare it with