rushdbvsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rushdb | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Vector Database | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 56 876 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +147 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+147 stars in 30 days).
rushdb details →Typst details →