qdrantvsrushdb
Two self-hosted Vector Database projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| qdrant | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Vector Database | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 35 300 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +529 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 32 |
| Latest release | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | @rushdb/mcp-server@2.13.0 · 31 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 32 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for qdrant.
If you want the quickest setup, qdrant is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+529 stars in 30 days).
qdrant details →rushdb details →All Vector Database projects →