rushdbvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rushdb | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Vector Database | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
rushdb details →Tube Archivist details →