rushdbvsSyslog-ng
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rushdb | Syslog-ng | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 48/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 5 in Vector Database | #3 of 8 in Logging |
| GitHub stars | 325 | 2 386 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +10 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 33 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | syslog-ng-4.12.0 · 16 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Syslog-ng scores 66/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Syslog-ng.
If you want the quickest setup, Syslog-ng is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
Syslog-ng is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
rushdb details →Syslog-ng details →