ruptimevsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ruptime | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 17 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 45/100 for ruptime, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; ruptime needs more configuration.
ruptime details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep ruptime, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with