ruptimevsShinobi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ruptime | Shinobi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #3 of 24 in Video Surveillance |
| GitHub stars | 213 | — |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | — |
Which one should you pick?
Shinobi scores 66/100 against 45/100 for ruptime, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ruptime is easier to run; Shinobi needs more configuration.
ruptime details →Shinobi details →
Swap a project
Keep ruptime, compare it with
Keep Shinobi, compare it with