ruptimevssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ruptime | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #17 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 213 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 45/100 for ruptime, so it is the safer default.
sdnext is growing faster right now (+16 stars in 30 days).
ruptime details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep ruptime, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with