rudderstackvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 93 041 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +1 294 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 294 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with