rudderstackvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 76 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ToolJet scores 77/100 against 64/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 39 for rudderstack.
If you want the quickest setup, ToolJet is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
ToolJet is growing faster right now (+154 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with