rudderstackvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| rudderstack | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 4 508 | 35 794 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +20 | +869 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 28 |
| Latest release | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.
rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 28 for SeaweedFS.
If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+869 stars in 30 days).
rudderstack details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep rudderstack, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with